Cannabidiol in wound healing: validation of an experimental protocol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31790/inspilip.v9i30.823Palabras clave:
Cannabidiol, preclinical model, expeimental protocol, alternative medicineResumen
Validating well-structured experimental protocols is essential to ensure reproducibility and data quality in preclinical studies. This work presents a rigorous methodological framework for assessing wound healing in a murine model using cannabidiol (CBD) ointments at 1.5% and 3% concentrations. A completely randomized block design (CRBD) was applied, using sex as a blocking factor. Thirty CD1 murin biomodels were considered and selected based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and housed individually under controlled conditions with environmental enrichment. The approval of the Bioethics Committee of the Agrarian University of Ecuador was proposed, with technical support from INSPI and CBD formulations provided by ALLYMA CORP. The protocol included an adaptation phase, standardized wound induction, daily treatment application, and 21-day clinical evaluation. Photographic documentation was standardized using a fixed metallic base. The results demonstrated successful execution across all phases, highlighting the structured statistical organization, control of external variables, and consistency in data collection. This preclinical study provides a valuable contribution to research involving cannabidiol and other underexplored compounds in alternative medicine, offering a solid, ethical, and reproducible methodological foundation for future investigations.
Citas
1. ElSohly, M. A., Radwan, M. M., Gul, W., Chandra, S., & Galal, A. (2017). Phytochemistry of Cannabis sativa L. Prog Chem Org Nat Prod, 1-36. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45541-9_1
2. Schilling, S., Melzer, R., & McCabe, P. F. (6 de enero de 2020). Cannabis Sativa. Current Biology, 30(1), R8-R9.
3. Coopeland Halperin, L. R., Herrera Gómez, L. C., La Pier, J., Shank, N., & Shin, J. (2021). Los efectos del cannabis: implicaciones para el paciente quirúrgico. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob, 9(3), e3448. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003448
4. Martinelli, J., Magnavacca, A., Fumagalli, M., Dell'Agli, M., Plaza, S., & Sangiovanni, E. (2022). Cannabis sativa y salud de la piel: análisis del papel de los fitocannabinoides. Planta Med, 88(7), 492-506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1420-5780
5. Henshaw, F. R., Dewsbury, L. S., Lim, C. K., & Steiner, G. Z. (2021). The Effects of Cannabinoids on Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines: A Systematic Review of In Vivo Studies. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 6(3), 177-195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2020.0105
6. Denayer, T., Stohr , T., & Van Roy, M. (2014). Animal models in translational medicine: Validation and prediction. New Horizons in Translational Medicine, 2(1), 5-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhtm.2014.08.001
7. Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics, 1(2), 94-99. doi:10.4103/0976-500X.72351
8. Weller, M. G. (2021). The protocol gap. Methods and protocols, 4(12), 1-5. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/mps4010012
9. Lin, Y., Yang, F., Shang, B., Speich, J. E., Yvonne Wan, Y.-J., Hashida, H., . . . Zhang, K. (2024). Reporting quality of animal research in journals that published the ARRIVE 1.0 or ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines: a cross-sectional analysis of 943 studies. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy, 14(6), 1070-1082. doi:10.21037/cdt-24-413
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.















